Texas A&M University-Kingsville vs University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus

Kingsville, TX · Norman, OK · largest Scorecard gap: 150%-time completion

Scorecard match plate

Pair TX:OK

PUBLIC-PAIR · CROSS-STATE · ACCEPT-OPEN · NET-SPLIT · EARN-SPLIT · DEBT-SPLIT · COMPLETE-GAP · GAP-OUTCOME

  • PUBLIC-PAIR Public pair
  • CROSS-STATE TX × OK
  • ACCEPT-OPEN Open admission
  • NET-SPLIT Net-price split
  • EARN-SPLIT Earnings split
  • DEBT-SPLIT Debt split
  • COMPLETE-GAP Completion gap
  • GAP-OUTCOME Largest gap · 150%-Time Completion

Instrument codes from this pair's College Scorecard ownership, geography, acceptance, net price, earnings, debt, and completion, plus the ENROLL-1SIDE · modest · 2013–2023 decade-path stamp below, not a ranking or recommendation.

Decade path · College Scorecard

Only one enrollment path is a trend

ENROLL-1SIDE · modest · 2013–2023

Size changed directionally at one school over 2013–2023; the peer's series stays a range. Pair any selectivity note with that asymmetry before treating the two campuses as parallel growth stories.

  • Texas A&M University-Kingsville: enrollment shrank -50.8% over 2013–2023; fitted -413 students/yr fitted, r² 0.71.
  • University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus: enrollment ranged 20,528–21,675 (2013–2023, 11 points) without a stable fitted direction.
  • Texas A&M University-Kingsville: acceptance-rate path 2013–2023 stays non-directional here (r² 0.34).
  • University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus: acceptance-rate path 2013–2023 stays non-directional here (r² 0.00).

College Scorecard institution series; dollars are nominal. Direction claims require r² ≥ 0.40 on the fitted annual slope, otherwise the page reports the observed range. Descriptive history, not a recommendation.

Scorecard metrics

Largest gaps: Texas A&M University-Kingsville vs University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus

  1. 150%-TIME-COMPLETI University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus leads on 150%-time completion (75.3% vs 43.6% at Texas A&M University-Kingsville)
  2. RETENTION-RATE University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus leads on retention rate (90.0% vs 64.6% at Texas A&M University-Kingsville)
  3. AVG-NET-PRICE Texas A&M University-Kingsville leads on avg net price ($12,090 vs $15,300 at University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus)

Texas A&M University-Kingsville profile · University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus profile · Compare other colleges

150%-Time Completion and other Scorecard questions

On 150%-time completion, who leads between Texas A&M University-Kingsville and University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus?
University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus leads on 150%-time completion at 75.3% versus 43.6% at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard.
On retention rate, who leads between Texas A&M University-Kingsville and University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus?
University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus leads on retention rate at 90.0% versus 64.6% at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard.
On avg net price, who leads between Texas A&M University-Kingsville and University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus?
Texas A&M University-Kingsville leads on avg net price at $12,090 versus $15,300 at University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus. Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard.

Source: U.S. Department of Education, College Scorecard College Scorecard institution outcomes (earnings, completion, debt); 150%-time completion focus for this pair · 2025