University of Arkansas Grantham vs Texas A&M University-Victoria

LIttle Rock, AR · Victoria, TX · largest Scorecard gap: retention rate

Scorecard match plate

Pair AR:TX

PUBLIC-PAIR · CROSS-STATE · NET-PAR · EARN-SPLIT · DEBT-SPLIT · COMPLETE-PAR · GAP-OUTCOME

  • PUBLIC-PAIR Public pair
  • CROSS-STATE AR × TX
  • NET-PAR Net near-par
  • EARN-SPLIT Earnings split
  • DEBT-SPLIT Debt split
  • COMPLETE-PAR Completion near-par
  • GAP-OUTCOME Largest gap · Retention Rate

Instrument codes from this pair's College Scorecard ownership, geography, acceptance, net price, earnings, debt, and completion, plus the NET-SPLIT · 2013–2023 decade-path stamp below, not a ranking or recommendation.

Decade path · College Scorecard

One campus shows net-price relief; the peer does not

NET-SPLIT · 2013–2023

Over 2013–2023, only one school has a directional decline in average net price; the other stays a measured range. Cost gaps on this board are moving targets, not fixed snapshot deltas.

  • University of Arkansas Grantham: average net price fell -13.2% from $10,744 (2013) to $9,325 (2023), r² 0.49.
  • Texas A&M University-Victoria: net price ranged $8,624–$10,991 across 11 years (2013–2023); endpoint change -11.7% is not a trend (r² 0.01).
  • University of Arkansas Grantham: enrollment shrank -66.4% over 2013–2023; fitted -732 students/yr fitted, r² 0.95.
  • Texas A&M University-Victoria: enrollment ranged 2,630–3,388 (2013–2023, 11 points) without a stable fitted direction.

College Scorecard institution series; dollars are nominal. Direction claims require r² ≥ 0.40 on the fitted annual slope, otherwise the page reports the observed range. Descriptive history, not a recommendation.

Scorecard metrics

Cards ordered by relative gap on this pair. Teal = better side.

Largest gaps: University of Arkansas Grantham vs Texas A&M University-Victoria

  1. RETENTION-RATE Texas A&M University-Victoria leads on retention rate (65.1% vs 30.3% at University of Arkansas Grantham)
  2. OUT-OF-STATE-TUITI University of Arkansas Grantham leads on out-of-state tuition ($8,520 vs $16,989 at Texas A&M University-Victoria)
  3. MEDIAN-EARNINGS-(6 Texas A&M University-Victoria leads on median earnings (6 yr) ($44,888 vs $26,870 at University of Arkansas Grantham)

University of Arkansas Grantham profile · Texas A&M University-Victoria profile · Compare other colleges

Retention Rate and other Scorecard questions

On retention rate, who leads between University of Arkansas Grantham and Texas A&M University-Victoria?
Texas A&M University-Victoria leads on retention rate at 65.1% versus 30.3% at University of Arkansas Grantham. Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard.
On out-of-state tuition, who leads between University of Arkansas Grantham and Texas A&M University-Victoria?
University of Arkansas Grantham leads on out-of-state tuition at $8,520 versus $16,989 at Texas A&M University-Victoria. Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard.
On median earnings (6 yr), who leads between University of Arkansas Grantham and Texas A&M University-Victoria?
Texas A&M University-Victoria leads on median earnings (6 yr) at $44,888 versus $26,870 at University of Arkansas Grantham. Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard.

Source: U.S. Department of Education, College Scorecard College Scorecard institution outcomes (earnings, completion, debt); retention rate focus for this pair · 2025