PlainCollege

University of Minnesota-Twin Cities vs Nova Southeastern University

Minneapolis, MN · Fort Lauderdale, FL · largest Scorecard gap: in-state tuition

Scorecard match plate

Pair MN:FL

MIXED-SECTOR · CROSS-STATE · ACCEPT-OPEN · NET-SPLIT · EARN-SPLIT · DEBT-SPLIT · COMPLETE-GAP · GAP-TUITION

  • MIXED-SECTOR Mixed sector
  • CROSS-STATE MN × FL
  • ACCEPT-OPEN Open admission
  • NET-SPLIT Net-price split
  • EARN-SPLIT Earnings split
  • DEBT-SPLIT Debt split
  • COMPLETE-GAP Completion gap
  • GAP-TUITION Largest gap · In-State Tuition

Instrument codes from this pair's College Scorecard ownership, geography, acceptance, net price, earnings, debt, and completion, plus the ENROLL-1SIDE · brisk · 2013–2023 decade-path stamp below, not a ranking or recommendation.

Decade path · College Scorecard

Headcount surged on one side only

ENROLL-1SIDE · brisk · 2013–2023

Nova Southeastern University posted a brisk directional enrollment rise over 2013–2023 while its peer's size series stays a range. Pair any cost snapshot with that asymmetry before treating the campuses as parallel growth stories.

  • Nova Southeastern University: enrollment grew +41.9% over 2013–2023; fitted +283 students/yr fitted, r² 0.76.
  • University of Minnesota-Twin Cities: enrollment ranged 30,135–31,535 (2013–2023, 11 points) without a stable fitted direction.
  • University of Minnesota-Twin Cities: acceptance rate eased +73.4% across 2013–2023 (r² 0.90).
  • Nova Southeastern University: acceptance rate eased +26.5% across 2013–2023 (r² 0.56).

College Scorecard institution series; dollars are nominal. Direction claims require r² ≥ 0.40 on the fitted annual slope, otherwise the page reports the observed range. Descriptive history, not a recommendation.

Scorecard metrics

Cards ordered by relative gap on this pair. Teal = better side.

Largest gaps: University of Minnesota-Twin Cities vs Nova Southeastern University

  1. IN-STATE-TUITION University of Minnesota-Twin Cities leads on in-state tuition ($17,214 vs $38,700 at Nova Southeastern University)
  2. AVG-NET-PRICE University of Minnesota-Twin Cities leads on avg net price ($16,778 vs $30,371 at Nova Southeastern University)
  3. 150%-TIME-COMPLETI University of Minnesota-Twin Cities leads on 150%-time completion (85.0% vs 63.8% at Nova Southeastern University)

University of Minnesota-Twin Cities profile · Nova Southeastern University profile · Compare other colleges

In-State Tuition and other Scorecard questions

On in-state tuition, who leads between University of Minnesota-Twin Cities and Nova Southeastern University?▼
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities leads on in-state tuition at $17,214 versus $38,700 at Nova Southeastern University. Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard.
On avg net price, who leads between University of Minnesota-Twin Cities and Nova Southeastern University?▼
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities leads on avg net price at $16,778 versus $30,371 at Nova Southeastern University. Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard.
On 150%-time completion, who leads between University of Minnesota-Twin Cities and Nova Southeastern University?▼
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities leads on 150%-time completion at 85.0% versus 63.8% at Nova Southeastern University. Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard.

Source: U.S. Department of Education, College Scorecard College Scorecard institution outcomes (earnings, completion, debt); in-state tuition focus for this pair · 2025