Original analysis · Annual College Scorecard observations

How College Net Prices Changed, 2013–2023

A fixed-span comparison of operating colleges, using every available annual observation and a trend-quality threshold instead of ranking two isolated endpoints.

1,240
Comparable colleges
346
Fitted downward trends
894
Fitted upward trends

The result in one line

Celebrity School of Beauty has the steepest fitted decline at −$2,115 per year, while Southwest Institute of Healing Arts has the steepest fitted increase at +$4,139 per year.

According to the U.S. Department of Education's College Scorecard.

−$2,115/yr
Steepest fitted decline
+$4,139/yr
Steepest fitted increase
r² ≥ 0.40
Trend-quality floor

Nominal dollars; descriptive trends, not causal estimates.

The research question

Which colleges show the strongest sustained movement in average net price across a comparable 2013–2023 span? Average net price is cost of attendance minus federal, state, and institutional grants and scholarships for full-time, first-time undergraduate students who receive Title IV federal aid. It is an institutional average, not a price quote for a particular family.

How we measured it

We fit an ordinary least-squares line through each institution’s annual average-net-price observations. The comparison includes currently operating colleges with at least 500 enrolled students, positive values at both endpoints, at least eight observations, the same 2013–2023 span, and r² of at least 0.40. We rank by the fitted dollar slope per year. Using a fixed span makes the rows comparable; using the slope prevents a tiny starting value from dominating the ranking through an extreme percentage change.

The year labels are annual observations in the current College Scorecard data, not archived snapshots of separate publication releases. This report therefore measures changes through time within the current dataset. It does not claim to measure revisions between Scorecard releases.

The steepest sustained net-price declines

Absolute fitted dollars per year · fixed 2013–2023 span

decline per year

What this shows A decline means the fitted nominal average net price moved downward. It does not establish which policy, aid, enrollment, or reporting change produced that movement.

Source U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard As of 2013–2023 annual series

See the full ranking of declining net prices →

The steepest sustained net-price increases

Absolute fitted dollars per year · fixed 2013–2023 span

increase per year

What this shows These are nominal-dollar increases, so general price inflation is part of the movement. The analysis does not adjust the series into constant dollars.

Source U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard As of 2013–2023 annual series

See the full ranking of rising net prices →

How to interpret the results

A fitted slope summarizes the direction across all observed years. r² describes how much of the year-to-year variation is explained by that straight-line trend. The 0.40 floor removes the noisiest series, but it does not mean that every qualifying college changed smoothly or that its future price will continue along the same line.

Changes can reflect tuition, living costs, grant aid, the income mix of federal-aid recipients, program mix, institutional reporting, or several factors at once. This analysis does not isolate those causes. A lower average net price can be encouraging, but students should still compare their own aid offers, borrowing needs, completion prospects, and program outcomes.

Download and reproduce the data

Download the complete qualifying cohort as CSV. Each row includes the annual fitted slope, endpoints, endpoint change, number of observations, r², enrollment, state, and profile URL. The file uses the same cohort rules that power this report and both rankings.

Limitations

  • All dollar values are nominal and are not adjusted for inflation.
  • Average net price covers a defined federal-aid cohort and is not representative of every student.
  • The enrollment and operating-status filters describe the current institution record, while the price observations cover earlier years.
  • Linear fit is a compact summary; it can hide reversals within the period.
  • Observational movement cannot establish why a college’s average net price changed.

Sources

U.S. Department of Education, College Scorecard institution-level data and documentation, available at collegescorecard.ed.gov/data. PlainCollege’s transformation and cohort rules are documented above and in the downloadable file.

Every figure on PlainCollege is rendered directly from the U.S. Department of Education's College Scorecard data, no number is typed in by an editor. Least-squares trends are computed from every stored annual observation; the report and CSV share the same fixed-span cohort query. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error on this page. Review the public data changelog. Data current as of 2013–2023 annual series.