The research question
Among widely-offered bachelor's degree fields, which produce the highest median graduate earnings, and how does the debt students take on compare to what they go on to earn?
How we measured it
We rank bachelor's-credential fields of study by the average of their per-school median earnings, restricted to fields offered widely enough to be representative (at least 15 institutions, each with at least 25 completers). Alongside earnings we show the median federal debt students in each field carry at graduation, and we derive a debt-to-earnings ratio - debt divided by annual earnings - as a simple proxy for how affordable the payoff is. A field paying high salaries on modest debt is a stronger value than one paying the same on far heavier debt. Every figure updates automatically whenever we refresh our College Scorecard field-of-study data; see the methodology page for the source vintage.
Top 10 bachelor's fields by median graduate earnings
Average of per-school median earnings within each field - College Scorecard
- Computer Science
Computer Science
$114,206 USD
- Computer Engineering
Computer Engineering
$112,808 USD
- Pharmacy
Pharmacy
$104,889 USD
- Electrical
Electrical
$102,323 USD
- Statistics
Statistics
$101,181 USD
- Applied Mathematics
Applied Mathematics
$99,882 USD
- Industrial Engineering
Industrial Engineering
$98,645 USD
- Chemical Engineering
Chemical Engineering
$98,564 USD
- Aerospace
Aerospace
$98,244 USD
- Biomedical/Medical Engin…
Biomedical/Medical Engineering
$95,080 USD
What this shows Engineering and computer-science fields dominate the top of this list nationally - but the debt these graduates carry to get there is worth reading alongside the raw earnings figure.
Earnings vs debt, side by side
| # | Field of study | Schools | Median earnings | Median debt | Debt / earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Computer Science | 241 | $114,206 | $20,702 | 18% |
| 2 | Computer Engineering | 126 | $112,808 | $21,770 | 19% |
| 3 | Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Sciences, and Administration | 19 | $104,889 | $21,333 | 20% |
| 4 | Electrical, Electronics, and Communications Engineering | 188 | $102,323 | $21,991 | 21% |
| 5 | Statistics | 37 | $101,181 | $19,399 | 19% |
| 6 | Applied Mathematics | 27 | $99,882 | $18,201 | 18% |
| 7 | Industrial Engineering | 64 | $98,645 | $22,589 | 23% |
| 8 | Chemical Engineering | 132 | $98,564 | $22,157 | 22% |
| 9 | Aerospace, Aeronautical, and Astronautical/Space Engineering | 58 | $98,244 | $22,992 | 23% |
| 10 | Biomedical/Medical Engineering | 97 | $95,080 | $21,997 | 23% |
Source: U.S. Department of Education, College Scorecard Field-of-Study Dataset. Values update automatically whenever PlainCollege refreshes its dataset.
What the ranking shows
Engineering and computing lead
The highest-earning bachelor's field in this dataset is Computer Science, whose graduates earn a median of $114,206 against median debt of $20,702 - a debt-to-earnings ratio of just 18%. The top of the table is dominated by engineering and computing fields, which combine strong starting salaries with relatively contained debt because much of the coursework leads directly into high-wage technical occupations. A low debt-to-earnings ratio is the signal to watch: it means a graduate's annual earnings comfortably exceed what they borrowed, so the loan is repaid as a small fraction of income rather than a long-term drag.
The debt-to-earnings lens
Ranking by salary alone is misleading, which is why the debt column matters. A field in the middle of this list, such as Applied Mathematics, earns $99,882 on median debt of $18,201. Across the whole top ten, debt levels are fairly similar while earnings vary, so the ratio compresses toward the top: nearly every field here repays its debt within a comfortable multiple of a single year's earnings. The fields to be cautious about are not on this list - they are the ones where debt rivals or exceeds first-decade earnings, which is where a degree can become a financial burden rather than an investment.
Why these fields pay
The fields at the top of this list share a common thread: they map directly onto occupations with persistent labor shortages and measurable, in-demand technical skills. Engineering and computing graduates enter roles where employers compete for a limited supply of qualified candidates, which bids up starting salaries and keeps them climbing through the first decade. Health-adjacent and quantitative fields show the same pattern for the same reason. Crucially, these fields tend to pair high pay with moderate debt because the credential leads quickly into well-paid work, so borrowers repay from a strong income base rather than stretching loans across years of lower earnings. That combination - scarce skills, strong demand, and a fast path to repayment - is what separates a genuinely high-return major from one that merely sounds prestigious.
How to use this
A high-earning field is not automatically the right field - interest, aptitude, and completion odds matter enormously, and a student who switches out of a demanding major captures none of its earnings premium. Treat this ranking as evidence that field of study is one of the largest controllable levers on the financial return of a degree, often larger than the choice of institution. The per-program profiles linked in the table show how earnings for each field vary across schools, so a student can see whether a particular college over- or under-delivers within their intended major, and whether the debt typical of that field at that school stays within a comfortable multiple of expected earnings.
What this analysis cannot tell us
Field-level earnings are measured a few years after completion in the College Scorecard field-of-study file, not ten years out, so they understate lifetime trajectories for fields with steep late-career growth such as medicine and law. Averaging per-school medians weights each institution equally rather than by the number of graduates. The debt figure is median federal loan debt and excludes private loans and family contributions. Restricting to fields offered at 15 or more schools deliberately excludes narrow or rare programs that may pay very well or very poorly. Earnings cover only federal-aid recipients who were employed and not enrolled in further study, which understates fields that funnel large shares of graduates into further degrees before they begin earning. Because the ranking averages each field across many institutions, a single school with unusually strong or weak outcomes does not dominate the field-level figure shown here. Suppressed values are excluded rather than treated as zero.
Sources
- U.S. Department of Education, College Scorecard - collegescorecard.ed.gov
- U.S. Department of Education, IPEDS - nces.ed.gov/ipeds